In biological wastewater treatment, oxygen is everything. Aerobic bacteria need it to break down organic matter, and blowers are the machines that deliver it—injecting air into tanks with precision and consistency. But not all blowers are created equal. From legacy lobe systems to cutting-edge turbo blowers, each technology offers distinct advantages depending on plant size, load variability, and budget.
📊 Why Blowers Matter
- Aeration = 40–70% of total energy use in most wastewater plants Atlas Copco
- Blower selection affects:
- Oxygen transfer efficiency
- Energy consumption
- Maintenance frequency
- Noise levels
- Total cost of ownership (TCO)
🔍 Blower Types Compared
1. Lobe (Roots) Blowers
- Mechanism: Two rotating lobes trap and push air
- Pressure Range: Up to 1 bar (15 psi)
- Efficiency: ~50–60%
- Noise: High
- Maintenance: Moderate (oil changes, wear parts)
💡 Best for: Small plants with steady loads
Example: Gardner Denver DuroFlow, Kaeser Omega Series
2. Screw Blowers
- Mechanism: Twin helical rotors compress air internally
- Pressure Range: Up to 1.2 bar
- Efficiency: ~65–75% Atlas Copco considerblog.com
- Noise: Low
- Maintenance: Low (oil-free options available)
💡 Best for: Medium to large plants focused on energy savings
Example: Atlas Copco ZS Series, Aerzen Delta Hybrid
3. Turbo Blowers
- Mechanism: High-speed impellers with air bearings
- Pressure Range: Up to 1 bar
- Efficiency: ~75–85% visionequipment.net Compressed Air Best Practices
- Noise: Very low
- Maintenance: Minimal (no oil, few moving parts)
💡 Best for: Large plants with variable loads and automation needs
Example: Howden SG Series, APG-Neuros Turbo Blower
4. Centrifugal Blowers
- Mechanism: Radial impellers accelerate air outward
- Pressure Range: Up to 2 bar
- Efficiency: ~60–70%
- Noise: Moderate
- Maintenance: Moderate (lubrication, balancing)
💡 Best for: High-pressure applications and large-scale aeration
Example: Ingersoll Rand Centac, Sulzer HST Series
📈 Performance Snapshot
| Blower Type | Efficiency | Noise Level | Maintenance | Ideal Plant Size | Typical Lifespan |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobe | 50–60% | High | Moderate | Small–Medium | 10–15 years |
| Screw | 65–75% | Low | Low | Medium–Large | 15–20 years |
| Turbo | 75–85% | Very Low | Minimal | Large | 20+ years |
| Centrifugal | 60–70% | Moderate | Moderate | Large | 15–20 years |
Sources: Atlas Copco CFM Air Equipment Xylem Atlas Copco considerblog.com visionequipment.net Compressed Air Best Practices inovairblowers.com
💸 Lifecycle Cost Comparison
According to Inovair and Atlas Copco:
- Lobe blowers: Lowest upfront cost, highest energy cost
- Screw blowers: 20–30% energy savings over lobe
- Turbo blowers: 30–40% energy savings, lowest maintenance
- Centrifugal blowers: High capital cost, good for high-pressure needs
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) includes:
- Capital cost
- Energy use
- Maintenance
- Downtime risk
Example: A 150 HP lobe blower may cost $40,000 upfront but consume $60,000/year in energy. A turbo blower may cost $80,000 but only $36,000/year in energy—paying for itself in under 3 years inovairblowers.com Atlas Copco.
🧠 Optimization Strategies
- Use VFDs to match blower output to oxygen demand
- Install DO sensors for real-time control
- Audit airflow annually to detect inefficiencies
- Consider hybrid systems for flexible operation
🧭 Final Takeaway
Blowers aren’t just mechanical components—they’re strategic investments. The right choice can reduce energy costs by 30–40%, improve effluent quality, and extend equipment life. Whether you’re upgrading a legacy system or designing a new plant, blower selection should be data-driven, not default.
Water Solutions You Can Trust 
Leave a comment